I think there is a big difference in topical vs expository preaching. While both are ‘preaching the word’, I have an opinion that expository comes across as a deeper dive into the word. However, some people get lost in that deep dive and can’t connect the dots to their own lives and so they don’t get anything from the message. The converse is true of the topical, sometimes it is so shallow to the hearer that it seems elementary.

I prefer expository but attend a church that is more topical in presentation. I find that I enjoy listening to podcasts throughout the week to get some of the exposition that is missing on Sunday morning.

Anyway, those are my pennies.

The eisegesis that occurs when one approaches the text with a presupposed idea is what bugs me. Your “weapon” metaphor, e.g.

I have become appreciative of tradition since leaving seminary.

the ‘weapon’ thought is so true.

1. Scripture
2. Reason
3. Tradition
4. Experience

But beyond that the whole authority of scripture thing is a deep psychological topic for some ‘dudes’. I feel that some want the Scripture Authority so they can use it as a weapon to control things and people around them. It’s kind of scary sometimes.

Scripture alone is a good idea, but like Nate was saying (I think) It doesn’t always hold up practically.

I would also hope that “dude” avoids seminary. He would be annoying.

Sounds like “Dude” needs to go to seminary.

Churches have to relate the gospel to present times, situations, and circumstances to have affect in present day.
Jokes, stories, illustrations are exactly how Jesus taught the masses.
He used the WORD as his foundation – but painted the picture with stories.

We call ourselves a “word” church. But that doesn’t mean we don’t mix it up and have fun. I think a line upon line teaching church would be boring…

Just my two cents.

Josh
Staff Pastor at a “Word Church”