Comments on: Missing the point | evolution http://www.nikao.ws/2009/11/23/missing-the-point-evolution/ the price you pay for the life you choose Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:20:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Vince http://www.nikao.ws/2009/11/23/missing-the-point-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-4750 Vince Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:41:36 +0000 http://www.nikao.ws/?p=1917#comment-4750 I started noticing the same thing once I started poking around the Kirk Cameron site....definitely starting to look like a flame job post. Maybe it's convincing because it's what we have come to expect from that camp. Thanks mike for bringing us down to earth. I started noticing the same thing once I started poking around the Kirk Cameron site….definitely starting to look like a flame job post. Maybe it’s convincing because it’s what we have come to expect from that camp.

Thanks mike for bringing us down to earth.

]]> By: Mike http://www.nikao.ws/2009/11/23/missing-the-point-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-4749 Mike Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:38:25 +0000 http://www.nikao.ws/?p=1917#comment-4749 I get your point Vince. However...I am deeply suspicious of the accuracy of this guy's commentary. There is obviously nothing "objective" about his reporting of the incident and I am at a loss to find the actual un-retweeted news story itself. Using my 'extensive' resources (read: Google), all I can conclude is that Kirk Cameron is talking about his favorite pastor and his rewrite of Origin of the Species. Whether any of the "quotes" in the article you link to are accurate, i can't find them. I am always suspicious of people who don't link to the stories they are commenting on. He does do an update at the bottom claiming that the manuscript in question has now "disappeared". He finds that suspicious...I also find him suspicious. I get your point Vince. However…I am deeply suspicious of the accuracy of this guy’s commentary. There is obviously nothing “objective” about his reporting of the incident and I am at a loss to find the actual un-retweeted news story itself. Using my ‘extensive’ resources (read: Google), all I can conclude is that Kirk Cameron is talking about his favorite pastor and his rewrite of Origin of the Species. Whether any of the “quotes” in the article you link to are accurate, i can’t find them. I am always suspicious of people who don’t link to the stories they are commenting on.

He does do an update at the bottom claiming that the manuscript in question has now “disappeared”. He finds that suspicious…I also find him suspicious.

]]>